Geoengineering (“Climate Modification”) Program Promoted by Corporate Media

TUNE IN TO “THE JACK BLOOD SHOW” THIS FRIDAY TO HEAR MUCH MORE ON THIS SUBJECT! Our Guest will be Michael Murphy. His new film is about to be released, “WHY in the world are they Spraying”.

The Intel Hub
By Avalon
February 20, 2012

Now that the alternative media has uncovered the Global Geoengineering programs that have been underway for over a decade, the corporate controlled media has been forced to admit and deal with this classified and top-secret program.

It is becoming more clear by the month that as classified programs are discovered and information about them reaches the masses, the corporate media, which is engaged in a cover-up or is self-censoring this news, has had to come forward and address these operations.

The risk of being discredited is one of their prime concerns – intelligent people would say they’re too late – the corporate medias credibility has self-destructed.

The Dynamic is the Awareness of the Information.

Although this is a brief video and may not have been viewed by many people, it clearly marks another entry point in the corporate media’s acknowledgement of what 75% of the alternative media has reported on for years.

Globally, the Geoengineering Program is underway at such a pace that some of the videos covering this activity are undeniable proof that the planet is being subjected to massive experimentation and potential toxic poisoning.

Pay particular attention to the statements in the video that suggest for example, “The Program will work”.

In order to make that statement, there would have to be data to base that decision on – PROOF that the statement is based on data gathered over years of Geoengineering the Planet.

Will the FBI Shut Down the Internet on March 8?

We advise you to be careful with this. We cannot verify if its a ploy to get your information. Yet we have a duty to report it. Thanks (admin Deadline Live)

The Hacker News

The Internet could go dark for millions of users as early as March 8 because of a virus that has corrupted computers in more than 100 countries. Last year, authorities in Estonia apprehended six men believed responsible for creating a malicious computer script called the DNSChanger Trojan. Once set loose on the Web, the worm corrupted computers in upwards of 100 countries, including an estimated 500,000 in America alone.

The FBI has published a pretty decent guide to performing the self-check here. If you are infected by the DNSChanger Trojan, the FBI reminds us that this malware also disables security updates which could have further exposed you to other malware. CLICK AT YOUR OWN RISK!

Kalashnikov 5: Brand-New AK-12 Rifle Unveiled

Lew Rockwell

Kalashnikov have unveiled the latest incarnation of their iconic assault rifle, the AK-47. The company says new generation firearm called the AK-12 combines reliability with precision, and can be used with one hand.

The factory which developed the new rifle decided to stick with the classic layout of the AK-47, even though it is a completely new weapon.

The Kalashnikov makers claim its has better range, increased fire dispersion, better ergonomics, usability and a potential for configuration changes.

The new weapon is as reliable as the AK-74, the Izmash factory CEO Maksim Kuzyuk says, but the dynamic characteristics differ significantly. It considerably increases the accuracy of shooting. The rifle is capable of firing in three modes: single shot, three shots and automatic fire mode.

Also, AK-12 is capable of using magazines of various types and capacity.

The basic feature of the new rifle is its modularity. It will serve as a basic platform for designing of over 20 modifications of small-arms weapons of various purpose and calibre.

AK-12’s composition allows operating it single-handedly, and can be converted for left or right handed use.
The rifle can accommodate night vision and Holo-sights, target indicator, or a light grenade launcher.

The AK-12 is undergoing firing tests in extreme conditions which should be completed by the end of the year. The Russian Ministry of Interior has already agreed to test the AK-12 in its special police units after official certification of the weapon.

Kalashnikov rifle

­

Kalashnikov rifle

­

Kalashnikov rifle

­

Kalashnikov rifle

­

Kalashnikov rifles

­

Kalashnikov rifles

­

Reprinted with permission from Russia Today.

SOPA author demands ISPs keep user data for 18 months

Lawmakers in the U.S. and Canada are considering two different, yet distinctly similar bills that critics say would forever end the concept of online privacy.

Both bills promise enhanced protections for children targeted by child pornographers on the Internet by mandating that Internet service providers (ISPs) maintain lengthy records of individual users’ electronic communications, which are to be handed over to authorities upon request.

In the U.S., Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) introduced the Protecting Children from Internet Pornographers Act (PCIP) last year, and it finally cleared committee before January, putting it on the fast-track for a vote by the full House at-large.  Two similar bills failed in 2009, but the latest attempt at data retention in the U.S has succeeded in part because it was overshadowed by uproar over another bill authored by Smith, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). SOPA, however, did not make it out of committee after the Internet’s first ever major work stoppage protest effectively scuttled most of the bill’s support.

Full Article

First ‘test-tube’ hamburger to be produced this year

The world’s first “test-tube” meat, a hamburger made from a cow’s stem cells, will be produced this fall, Dutch scientist Mark Post told a major science conference on Sunday.

Post’s aim is to invent an efficient way to produce skeletal muscle tissue in a laboratory that exactly mimics meat, and eventually replace the entire meat-animal industry.

The ingredients for his first burger are “still in a laboratory phase,” he said, but by fall “we have committed ourselves to make a couple of thousand of small tissues, and then assemble them into a hamburger.”

Full Article

Diet soda tied to heart attack, stroke risks: study

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – Diet soda may benefit the waistline, but a new study suggests that people who drink it every day have a heightened risk of heart attack and stroke.

The study, which followed almost 2,600 older adults for a decade, found that those who drank diet soda every day were 44 percent more likely than non-drinkers to suffer a heart attack or stroke.

The findings, reported in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, don’t prove that the sugar-free drinks are actually to blame.

Full Article

Getting Inside the Business of Making Sky Drones – Qui Bono?

The usual Suspects do not Like “competition”. “Competition is a SIN” said John D Rockefeller. Trust us, they believe it, and have pissed those beliefs down the food chain. So when creative entrepreneurs want to get into the “security” / surveillance / aero-photography business … Too Bad.

This murky world of the Military / Security industrial complex is nailed down by those who offer kickbacks, shares, inside info, or whom have “dope” on the decision makers. (IE: The Carlyle Group etc..) Those who have the power to make or break a man…. As we know, Oil / Energy, Weapons, even the Opium Trade works pretty much the same way.

Of course the added cost of this corruption is passed along to us, The Taxpayer, and the Consumer.

We always hear our politicians talking about the holy grail of “entrepreneurial-ism”, where we must “protect” the inventor, intellectual property, and the great American spirit of starting with nothing and rising to the top by your wits and hard work…

BULLSHITE! You don’t pay into the extortion racket… You ain’t gonna have any protection! and even then you may find yourself outbid, and out of luck. (At least the mafia keeps its word after extorting you… Governments, not so much. To quote the great Bill Hicks, “ALL governments are Liars and Murderers”.)

*Steve Jobs complained about this to Cousin Barry Obama and was dead within a year.

Here is a good example of what we are talking about:

Who is watching the watchers? He who controls the cameras, controls society...

Drones Set Sights on U.S. Skies

WOODLAND HILLS, Calif. — Daniel Gárate’s career came crashing to earth a few weeks ago. That’s when the Los Angeles Police Department warned local real estate agents not to hire photographers like Mr. Gárate, who was helping sell luxury property by using a droneto shoot sumptuous aerial movies. Flying drones for commercial purposes, the police said, violated federal aviation rules.

“I was paying the bills with this,” said Mr. Gárate, who recently gave an unpaid demonstration of his drone in this Southern California suburb.

His career will soon get back on track. A new federal law, signed by the president on Tuesday, compels the Federal Aviation Administration to allow drones to be used for all sorts of commercial endeavors — from selling real estate and dusting crops, to monitoring oil spills and wildlife, even shooting Hollywood films. Local police and emergency services will also be freer to send up their own drones.

But while businesses, and drone manufacturers especially, are celebrating the opening of the skies to these unmanned aerial vehicles, the law raises new worries about how much detail the drones will capture about lives down below — and what will be done with that information. Safety concerns like midair collisions and property damage on the ground are also an issue.

American courts have generally permitted surveillance of private property from public airspace. But scholars of privacy law expect that the likely proliferation of drones will force Americans to re-examine how much surveillance they are comfortable with.

“As privacy law stands today, you don’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy while out in public, nor almost anywhere visible from a public vantage,” said Ryan Calo, director of privacy and robotics at the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford University. “I don’t think this doctrine makes sense, and I think the widespread availability of drones will drive home why to lawmakers, courts and the public.”

Some questions likely to come up: Can a drone flying over a house pick up heat from a lamp used to grow marijuana inside, or take pictures from outside someone’s third-floor fire escape? Can images taken from a drone be sold to a third party, and how long can they be kept?

Drone proponents say the privacy concerns are overblown. Randy McDaniel, chief deputy of the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Department in Conroe, Tex., near Houston, whose agency bought a drone to use for various law enforcement operations, dismissed worries about surveillance, saying everyone everywhere can be photographed with cellphone cameras anyway. “We don’t spy on people,” he said. “We worry about criminal elements.”

Still, the American Civil Liberties Union and other advocacy groups are calling for new protections against what the A.C.L.U. has said could be “routine aerial surveillance of American life.”

Under the new law, within 90 days, the F.A.A. must allow police and first responders to fly drones under 4.4 pounds, as long as they keep them under an altitude of 400 feet and meet other requirements. The agency must also allow for “the safe integration” of all kinds of drones into American airspace, including those for commercial uses, by Sept. 30, 2015. And it must come up with a plan for certifying operators and handling airspace safety issues, among other rules.

The new law, part of a broader financing bill for the F.A.A., came after intense lobbying by drone makers and potential customers.

The agency probably will not be making privacy rules for drones. Although federal law until now had prohibited drones except for recreational use or for some waiver-specific law enforcement purposes, the agency has issued only warnings, never penalties, for unauthorized uses, a spokeswoman said. The agency was reviewing the law’s language, the spokeswoman said.

For drone makers, the change in the law comes at a particularly good time. With the winding-down of the war in Afghanistan, where drones have been used to gather intelligence and fire missiles, these manufacturers have been awaiting lucrative new opportunities at home. The market for drones is valued at $5.9 billion and is expected to double in the next decade, according to industry figures. Drones can cost millions of dollars for the most sophisticated varieties to as little as $300 for one that can be piloted from an iPhone.

“We see a huge potential market,” said Ben Gielow of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, a drone maker trade group.

For Patrick Egan, who represents small businesses and others in his work for the Remote Control Aerial Photography Association in Sacramento, the new law also can’t come fast enough. Until 2007, when the federal agency began warning against nonrecreational use of drones, he made up to $2,000 an hour using a drone to photograph crops for farmers, helping them spot irrigation leaks. “I’ve got organic farmers screaming for me to come out,” he said.

The Montgomery County Sheriff’s Department in Texas bought its 50-pound drone in October from Vanguard Defense Industries, a company founded by Michael Buscher, who built drones for the army, and then sold them to an oil company whose ships were threatened by pirates in the Gulf of Aden. The company custom-built the drone, which takes pictures by day and senses heat sources at night. It cost $300,000, a fraction of the cost of a helicopter.

READ THE REST

Spray-on antenna: Wireless in a can!

But can it work for Pirate Radio Towers?

CNET

It sounds like a particularly suspicious late-night infomercial: Spray your way to a better wireless signal! Improve your range! Save battery! Transmit over great distances under water!

But Chamtech’s spray-on antenna is a real product with some impressive claims. It can be sprayed on almost any surface, even trees and orange barrels. It doesn’t suck up power. It works in a mysterious nanotech way.

 

This fuzzy image shows the first test of the spray antenna with the material applied to a tree.

Here’s how I imagine the antenna process goes:

Step 1: Spray antenna material on surface.
Step 2: Connect phone to material.
Step 3: ????
Step 4: Make a phone call to the moon.

Chamtech co-founder Anthony Sutera imagines a world where wireless antenna towers are replaced with nano-paint on walls, and issues like iPhone Antennagate are a thing of the past.

“We have come up with a material that when you spray it on, it lays out just in the right pattern and all of these little capacitors charge and discharge extremely quickly in real time and they don’t create any heat,” Sutera says in a video presentation about the product.

One of Chamtech’s tests turned an RFID chip with a 5-foot range into an RFID chip with a 700-foot range. The company lists a spray antenna kit on its site, but pricing for the public is not revealed. The U.S. government is reportedly already playing with the new material.

If all these claims bear out, then I can see everybody wanting to get their hands on a fresh can full of antenna. My only question is where in the grocery store it will be stocked: with the spray cheese or with the gold food paint?

Wireless Controlled Microchip delivers drug; will it replace shots?

So now all you have to do is Implant a chip in a “Bad” citizen that provides a kill dose, or a sleep dose, or a fear dose, or LSD… and you can control them with a push of a button? Just sayin…. Oh Right… Just Trust them. OK

Hey DARPA.. Can we see your model now? (Smaller, more powerful, and efficient)

(Reuters) – An implantable, wireless microchip delivered osteoporosis medicine to a small group of Danish women, raising hope for a new kind of drug delivery device that might allow patients to skip regular injections, U.S. researchers said on Thursday.

The device, now being developed by privately held Microchips Inc, has a wireless receiver that signals the microchip to release the drug.

“Until now, you never had any way you could do this,” said Dr. Robert Langer of the Massachusetts Institutes of Technology, who helped to develop the technology and is a board member of Microchips Inc.

Langer said the device could be used for different types of injectable drugs where getting people to take their medications regularly is a problem.

That is often the case in patients with severe osteoporosis, who tend to skip doses of their medications because they cannot tell whether or not the injections are affecting the density of their bones.

That is something the microchip was designed to overcome, said Robert Farra of Massachusetts-based Microchips, which paid for the study. Farra, Langer and colleagues published a paper on the study in Science Translational Medicine.

Instead of constantly releasing small amounts of drug, like most drug-delivery systems, the microchip releases medication on command all at once, much like an injection would.

It can be activated by telephone or computer using a special radiofrequency reserved for medical use to safeguard against accidental release of the drug, Langer said.

GOLD NANOPARTICLES

The microchip itself is a thin wafer, about the size of a small coin, made with tiny wells that hold concentrated doses of medication. These doses are covered with a layer of gold nanoparticles, which dissolve when exposed to a certain radiofrequency. The wafer is implanted under the skin with a receiver device that is roughly the size of a heart pacemaker, Langer said.

In the system’s first test in people, the team implanted the device in eight Danish women aged 65 to 70 with a severe form of osteoporosis which required injections of Eli Lilly & Co’s hormone treatment teriparatide.

The researchers sent daily signals to the microchip device to release the drug for up to 20 doses. Then, they followed up with a period in which the women took hormone injections.

As seen in animal studies, a fibrous collagen-based membrane developed around the device, but the drug still performed just as well as daily injections in the women, improving bone formation and reducing the risk of fractures, the researchers said.

Still, there were some hitches.

John Watson, a professor of bioengineering at the University of California, San Diego, said in an editorial the device failed to work in one of the patients, and that data was not included in the analysis.

And the team had some manufacturing issues and was able to manufacture only one device with all 20 reservoirs filled with the study drug. Even so, all doses in the microchips were released in the patients, a sign that the device could work in people, Watson said.

“Several years are still needed to bring this technology to approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and to the clinical promise reflected in this small study,” Watson wrote.

The current device holds only 20 doses, but Langer said the group is working on adding more doses to the device.

The company hopes to have a version of the device on the market in five years. Langer said he sees potential for other uses, such as treating diabetes or delivering cancer drugs.

SOURCE: bit.ly/xUUOwu Science Translational Medicine, February 16, 2012.

ALSO SEE:

Osteoporosis Drug Delivery via Wireless Microchip

Remote-Controlled Microchip Implant Delivers Bone Drug

Biochips: Microchips And Medicine Join Forces

Researchers to Decide what to do with of Deadly Laboratory Super Bird Flu

You have basically been WARNED!

We are REALLY hoping that this doesn't "accidentally " fall into the wrong hands.. (wink wink)

(Reuters) – When 22 bird flu experts meet at the World Health Organization this week, they will be tasked with deciding just how far scientists should go in creating lethal mutant viruses in the name of research.

The hurriedly assembled meeting is designed to try to settle an unprecedented row over a call to ban publication of two scientific studies which detail how to mutate H5N1 bird flu viruses into a form that could cause a deadly human pandemic.

But experts say whatever the outcome, no amount of censorship, global regulation or shutting down of research projects could stop rogue scientists getting the tools to create and release a pandemic H5N1 virus if they were intent on evil.

“It doesn’t matter how much you restrict scientists from doing good, bad people can still do bad things,” said Wendy Barclay, an expert in flu virology at Imperial College London.

The WHO called the meeting, for February 16 and 17 in Geneva, to work out how to break a deadlock between scientists who have studied the mutations needed to make H5N1 transmit between mammals and U.S. biosecurity chiefs who want their work censored or “redacted” before it goes into scientific journals.

Since the two research teams, one in the Netherlands and one in the United States, have found that just a small number of mutations would allow H5N1 to spread like ordinary flu between mammals – and remain just as deadly as it is now – the meeting is likely to be tense and highly secretive. WHO officials repeatedly stress it will be a “closed door” event.

DEEP CONCERN

The United Nations health body has said it is “deeply concerned about the potential negative consequences” of work by the two leading flu research teams who in December said they had found ways to make H5N1 into a easily transmissible form capable of causing lethal human pandemics.

Flu researchers from around the world – more than 30 teams in all – declared a 60-day moratorium starting on January 20 on “any research involving highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses” that produce easily contagious forms of the virus.

The WHO has invited 22 people to this week’s meeting, including the researchers who carried out the work, editors of the two journals, Science and Nature, who were asked to hold publication, and representatives from the U.S. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) which asked for the papers to be censored.

Keiji Fukuda, the WHO’s assistant director-general for health security and environment, who will chair the meeting, says he would like to secure agreement on whether the studies should be published, in full or part, and who should have access to them.

The scientific know-how is seen as vital for scientists to be able to develop vaccines, diagnostic tests and anti-viral drugs that could be deployed in the event of an H5N1 pandemic.

“It is important that research on these viruses should continue,” Fukuda told Reuters. “They do pose a risk. There’s a lot of things we don’t know about them. The question is not really should we continue to do research … but under what conditions can we do it so we don’t unnecessarily create fears and risks.”

Michael Osterholm, policy director at the Minnesota Center of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance and an NSABB member, has limited hope for what one meeting can achieve.

“Nothing will be solved in one meeting,” he said. “This is a complicated issue that requires a great deal of international input. It is not a simple yes or no … We have no margin for error here.”

The H5N1 virus, first detected in Hong Kong in 1997, remains entrenched among poultry in many countries, mainly in Asia, but so far remains hard for humans to catch. It is known to have infected nearly 700 people worldwide since 2003, killing half of them, a far higher fatality rate than the new H1N1 flu virus, which originated in swine and caused a human influenza pandemic in 2009/2010.

Ron Fouchier, the scientist leading the Dutch team that gave H5N1 various genetic mutations and made it transmissible in mammals, argues the research must be published to help public health officials better prepare for a scenario where the virus could mutate and become more deadly, spreading from person to person via coughs and sneezes.

He has also said other research teams around the world are close to the same findings, some of them inadvertently, and should be warned in advance how the virus could become airborne.

In the short term, most scientists agree the moratorium is “a good gesture,” as flu expert and former WHO health security adviser David Heymann describes it, one that offers the research community space to think.

SUPER STRAINS

But can it, or should it, go on forever?

Heymann, Barclay and many other scientists argue that stopping this type of research into flu viruses and other potentially lethal pathogens would set a dangerous precedent.

Although adding and deleting genes can create super-strains that put the entire world at risk, Heymann said, such work is also vital to developing tools such as effective vaccines and diagnostic tests which are needed quickly if a pandemic hits.

Preventing this research would also prevent legitimate and well-intentioned researchers from using all possible scientific options to prepare for naturally occurring, or deliberately caused, outbreaks.

John Edmunds, who heads the department of infectious disease epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, describes studies on genetic mutations of H5N1 as “very, very important work” that should not be stopped.

“This flu strain has the potential to cause such enormous damage, and it’s important to know how far away we are from a horrible event like that,” he said. “It appears we’re not that far off it. That doesn’t mean it’s inevitably going to happen, but it makes it more important that we’re vigilant.”

Heymann, who now leads the Centre on Global Health Security at the Chatham House think-tank in London, says the best possible outcome would be a globally agreed “best practices framework on how you conduct this research and how you provide the information to others.”

“It’s also crucial to get understanding that even if you don’t provide this research information, there are ways that rogue scientists can get it if they want to,” he said.

Next Page »